If I wanted water, I would have asked for water.


Monday, February 22, 2010

Monday Morning Review: BridgePort Highland Ambush

Long ago I drank a bottle of BridgePort Highland Ambush and have been long remiss in reviewing it. This is not entirely due to circumstances. Highland Ambush, as its name suggests, is a Scottish ale, in this case a bourbon-barrel-aged wee heavy. Here's the thing about wee heavies; I've found they come in three general categories. The first are failures, brewed too warm or with the wrong malt and are heavy, treacly, and worty. The second are warming and malty, a fine tipple but nothing much to get you dancing around the room. The final are sublime--dense, rich, and creamy, with complexities that draw out smoke and nut, dark fruit and caramel. In this latter camp are very few--most are in the middle camp.

Highland Ambush was first brewed in the 1980s, an homage to the heritage of then pub manager (and now famous whiskey guide) Stuart Ramsay--who, I can use this opportunity to mention, just started a blog. This year's reprise was a blend of two batches, the second aged in Maker's Mark barrels. (The label says 2/3s to 1/3, but on this Brewpublic video Jeff Edgerton says it was really 50/50.) The result is, I'm afraid to report, a second-camp wee heavy, albeit one with more character than most.

Aging a Scottish ale in bourbon barrels poses an additional challenge--you combine a sweet beer with a sweet whiskey. I won't call Highland Ambush cloying--actually, it's pretty impressive how dry it is, considering--but it's a sweet beer. There is a bit of peaty smokiness to add dimension, but you also get a pronounced vanilla note. It's interesting, that note actually has a bit of banana in it, and I'd love someone to tell me where it comes from (is it the same isoamyl acetate ester you find in hefeweizens?).

The line that separates the good from the great wee heavy may be past the ken of adjectives. It's more one of those "know-it-when-you-taste-it" things. There's something in the balance and complexity that makes a great one pop. Although Oregonians should like Scottish ales, given our somewhat similar climate, we don't. They resist our hop lust. When I try to foist a Scottish on an unsuspecting Beervanian, I am usually greeted with impatience. Life is too short to drink underhopped ale. I have had luck with Skull Splitter (though it may have been the name) and Traquair House, but few others. I fear Highland Ambush would leave them similarly unimpressed.

Be that as it may, Karl Ockert tells me it's selling well, which is good. I'm always pleased to hear a beer is selling well. Maybe it's sample bias--I know too damn many hopheads. That would explain a lot, actually.

Stats
Malts: Pale and Carmel Malts
Hops: (Few, but...) Kent Goldings
ABV: 6.8%
IBU: 40
Availability: Through the spring
Rating: B-

______________________
Share

7 comments:

Bill Night said...

Yep, I'll agree. Decent but I didn't dance around the room.

One of my favorite beers of all time (this list keeps growing) was the Wee Heavy at Roots 4 or 5 years ago. It matched your poetry-like description: smoke and nut, dark fruit and caramel.

Alesmith Wee Heavy is another really nice one.

Jared said...

I'd personaly put it in the failure category. Ya, it didn't match your disription of a failure, but it deffinatly didn't even come across as mediocre.

When I bought it I got two bottles thinking I could use the second at a beer tasting if it was any good. Now I have a second bottle of the stuff just sitting in the fridge. Still need to figure out what to do with it.

joe said...

Make stew or marinate some meat in it...it can't be that bad can it?

dr wort said...

I think Jared is my long lost brother! I put it the failure category as well. Went to Bridgeport with a group of four people. We all ordered a pint of Highland, no one finished they're pint. It was that bad. Yep, it could be used in a big pot of Chili, but that's about it. ;-}

Jeff Alworth said...

But Doc, you're like the little kid who can only eat Mac n Cheese. That you couldn't drink it is hardly useful information.

DOSiR said...

AleSmiths Wee Heavy didn't do a thing for me... not a big fan.

Still have my Bridgeport Highland in the fridge... will try it soon and review.

Recently had Laurelwoods Auld Battle Axe from the bottle... loved it. Thought it was much more fantastic than when I had it on tap. Even after only 3 months in the bottle on its side. Thankfully I have one more I plan on sitting on for a long time.

Not a huge fan of the style, but I think Laurelwood nailed it with the bottled version. Perhaps a keg sitting in the woods for a few years would do it a bit of good?

dr wort said...

Jeff,

I'd comment, but can't make sense of your statement.

No, I'm not a child. No, I don't eat Mac-n-cheese, nor understand how a child who only eats Mac-n-Cheese has anything to do with my past 20 years of drinking beer from around the world.

I'll tell you one thing... I know what a Scotch ale tastes like and that Bridgeport swill was definitely not even close. ;-}

Yes, I did drink half a pint of that so-called Scotch ale. Read by blog and you'll see I commented on that tasting.

Post a Comment

NOTE: Blogspot has been eating some comments, and there doesn't seem to be anything I can do about it. IF your comment doesn't appear, it's not you, it's not me, it's the genuiuses at Google. Sorry--